Bruno vs Hoppscotch
Bruno and Hoppscotch are both popular tools in the API Development space. Both use a open-source pricing model, with Bruno starting at Free and Hoppscotch at Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Bruno if you want offline-first, git-friendly api client that stores requests in files.. Bruno's biggest strengths include git-friendly file storage is a game-changer for teams and offline-first means no dependency on cloud services. Choose Hoppscotch if you prefer open-source api development ecosystem — lightweight and fast.. Key advantages include completely free and open-source and lightning fast — runs in the browser with no bloat. It's also rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0).
Offline-first, git-friendly API client that stores requests in files.
Open-source API development ecosystem — lightweight and fast.
| Bruno | Hoppscotch | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Open-source |
| Rating | ★ 4.0 | ★ 4.2 |
| Categories | API Development | API Development |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Bruno | Hoppscotch |
|---|---|---|
| File-based API collections (git-friendly) | ✓ | — |
| Offline-first — no cloud sync required | ✓ | — |
| REST and GraphQL support | ✓ | — |
| Environment variables and scripting | ✓ | — |
| CLI for CI/CD integration | ✓ | — |
| Import from Postman and Insomnia | ✓ | — |
| REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, and MQTT support | — | ✓ |
| Browser-based — no installation needed | — | ✓ |
| API testing with pre and post-request scripts | — | ✓ |
| Team collaboration with shared collections | — | ✓ |
| Code generation in multiple languages | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted option for enterprise teams | — | ✓ |
Bruno
Pros
- + Git-friendly file storage is a game-changer for teams
- + Offline-first means no dependency on cloud services
- + Free and open-source with no usage limits
- + Fast and lightweight compared to Postman
Cons
- − Smaller feature set than Postman
- − No built-in AI features
- − Team collaboration relies on git rather than built-in sharing
Hoppscotch
Pros
- + Completely free and open-source
- + Lightning fast — runs in the browser with no bloat
- + Supports protocols beyond REST (GraphQL, WebSocket, MQTT)
- + Self-hostable for enterprise privacy requirements
Cons
- − Smaller ecosystem and plugin support than Postman
- − No built-in AI features yet
- − Team features require self-hosted enterprise edition
The Bottom Line
Choose Bruno if: you want offline-first, git-friendly api client that stores requests in files.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: smaller feature set than postman.
Choose Hoppscotch if: you prefer open-source api development ecosystem — lightweight and fast.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.2 vs 4.0). Keep in mind: smaller ecosystem and plugin support than postman.
Both tools compete in the API Development space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
ReadMe
Postman
Swagger
Redocly
Insomnia
RapidAPI