Continue.dev vs Figma Dev Mode
Continue.dev and Figma Dev Mode are both popular tools in the Code Generation space. Continue.dev uses a open-source model starting at Free, while Figma Dev Mode is paid from $25/mo. Continue.dev offers a free tier, while Figma Dev Mode does not. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Continue.dev if you want the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. Continue.dev's biggest strengths include complete flexibility in llm provider choice and fully open-source with active community. Plus, it has a free tier to get started. Choose Figma Dev Mode if you prefer bridge the gap between design and development with ai-powered code generation.. Key advantages include eliminates manual design-to-code translation and ai code generation saves significant implementation time. It's also rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9).
The open-source AI code assistant for any LLM and any IDE.
Bridge the gap between design and development with AI-powered code generation.
| Continue.dev | Figma Dev Mode | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | $25/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Paid |
| Rating | ★ 3.9 | ★ 4.0 |
| Categories | Code Generation, AI Code Editors | Code Generation, No-Code / Low-Code AI |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Continue.dev | Figma Dev Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Tab autocomplete with any LLM provider | ✓ | — |
| In-editor chat with codebase context | ✓ | — |
| Support for local models via Ollama and LM Studio | ✓ | — |
| VS Code and JetBrains integration | ✓ | — |
| Customizable slash commands and context providers | ✓ | — |
| Fully open-source and self-hostable | ✓ | — |
| AI-powered code generation from designs | — | ✓ |
| Ready-to-use CSS, React, and SwiftUI snippets | — | ✓ |
| Design token inspection and export | — | ✓ |
| Asset export in multiple formats | — | ✓ |
| Compare design versions for changes | — | ✓ |
| Plugin ecosystem for code framework support | — | ✓ |
Continue.dev
Pros
- + Complete flexibility in LLM provider choice
- + Fully open-source with active community
- + Works with local models for total privacy
- + Highly customizable through config files
Cons
- − Requires more setup than turnkey solutions like Copilot
- − Quality depends heavily on which LLM you connect
- − Less polished UX compared to commercial alternatives
Figma Dev Mode
Pros
- + Eliminates manual design-to-code translation
- + AI code generation saves significant implementation time
- + Tight integration with Figma's design workflow
- + Supports multiple code frameworks
Cons
- − Requires Figma paid plan
- − Generated code may not match project conventions
- − Limited to component-level code generation
The Bottom Line
Choose Continue.dev if: you want the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. It has a free tier to get started, which Figma Dev Mode lacks. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: requires more setup than turnkey solutions like copilot.
Choose Figma Dev Mode if: you prefer bridge the gap between design and development with ai-powered code generation.. It holds a higher user rating (4.0 vs 3.9). Keep in mind: requires figma paid plan.
Both tools compete in the Code Generation space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
