Fly.io vs Continue.dev
Fly.io and Continue.dev are two popular AI coding tools that developers frequently compare. Fly.io uses a freemium model starting at Free, while Continue.dev is open-source from Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Fly.io if you want deploy apps globally with vms close to your users in seconds.. Fly.io's biggest strengths include global deployment as easy as single-region and full vm control without serverless limitations. It's also rated higher (4.2 vs 3.9). Choose Continue.dev if you prefer the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. Key advantages include complete flexibility in llm provider choice and fully open-source with active community.
Deploy apps globally with VMs close to your users in seconds.
The open-source AI code assistant for any LLM and any IDE.
| Fly.io | Continue.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Open-source |
| Rating | ★ 4.2 | ★ 3.9 |
| Categories | DevOps & Infrastructure | Code Generation, AI Code Editors |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Fly.io | Continue.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Global VM deployment in 30+ regions | ✓ | — |
| Firecracker microVM technology for fast boot | ✓ | — |
| Built-in Postgres and Redis hosting | ✓ | — |
| Anycast networking for global load balancing | ✓ | — |
| Persistent volumes for stateful apps | ✓ | — |
| Deploy from Dockerfile or buildpacks | ✓ | — |
| Tab autocomplete with any LLM provider | — | ✓ |
| In-editor chat with codebase context | — | ✓ |
| Support for local models via Ollama and LM Studio | — | ✓ |
| VS Code and JetBrains integration | — | ✓ |
| Customizable slash commands and context providers | — | ✓ |
| Fully open-source and self-hostable | — | ✓ |
Fly.io
Pros
- + Global deployment as easy as single-region
- + Full VM control without serverless limitations
- + Free tier includes enough resources for small apps
- + Great for full-stack apps that need low latency globally
Cons
- − Steeper learning curve than Vercel or Netlify
- − Pricing can be complex with multiple resources
- − Less frontend-optimized than specialized platforms
Continue.dev
Pros
- + Complete flexibility in LLM provider choice
- + Fully open-source with active community
- + Works with local models for total privacy
- + Highly customizable through config files
Cons
- − Requires more setup than turnkey solutions like Copilot
- − Quality depends heavily on which LLM you connect
- − Less polished UX compared to commercial alternatives
The Bottom Line
Choose Fly.io if: you want deploy apps globally with vms close to your users in seconds.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.2 vs 3.9). Keep in mind: steeper learning curve than vercel or netlify.
Choose Continue.dev if: you prefer the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: requires more setup than turnkey solutions like copilot.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
Bolt