Hoppscotch vs Bruno
Hoppscotch and Bruno are both popular tools in the API Development space. Both use a open-source pricing model, with Hoppscotch starting at Free and Bruno at Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Hoppscotch if you want open-source api development ecosystem — lightweight and fast.. Hoppscotch's biggest strengths include completely free and open-source and lightning fast — runs in the browser with no bloat. It's also rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). Choose Bruno if you prefer offline-first, git-friendly api client that stores requests in files.. Key advantages include git-friendly file storage is a game-changer for teams and offline-first means no dependency on cloud services.
Open-source API development ecosystem — lightweight and fast.
Offline-first, git-friendly API client that stores requests in files.
| Hoppscotch | Bruno | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Open-source |
| Rating | ★ 4.2 | ★ 4.0 |
| Categories | API Development | API Development |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Hoppscotch | Bruno |
|---|---|---|
| REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, and MQTT support | ✓ | — |
| Browser-based — no installation needed | ✓ | — |
| API testing with pre and post-request scripts | ✓ | — |
| Team collaboration with shared collections | ✓ | — |
| Code generation in multiple languages | ✓ | — |
| Self-hosted option for enterprise teams | ✓ | — |
| File-based API collections (git-friendly) | — | ✓ |
| Offline-first — no cloud sync required | — | ✓ |
| REST and GraphQL support | — | ✓ |
| Environment variables and scripting | — | ✓ |
| CLI for CI/CD integration | — | ✓ |
| Import from Postman and Insomnia | — | ✓ |
Hoppscotch
Pros
- + Completely free and open-source
- + Lightning fast — runs in the browser with no bloat
- + Supports protocols beyond REST (GraphQL, WebSocket, MQTT)
- + Self-hostable for enterprise privacy requirements
Cons
- − Smaller ecosystem and plugin support than Postman
- − No built-in AI features yet
- − Team features require self-hosted enterprise edition
Bruno
Pros
- + Git-friendly file storage is a game-changer for teams
- + Offline-first means no dependency on cloud services
- + Free and open-source with no usage limits
- + Fast and lightweight compared to Postman
Cons
- − Smaller feature set than Postman
- − No built-in AI features
- − Team collaboration relies on git rather than built-in sharing
The Bottom Line
Choose Hoppscotch if: you want open-source api development ecosystem — lightweight and fast.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.2 vs 4.0). Keep in mind: smaller ecosystem and plugin support than postman.
Choose Bruno if: you prefer offline-first, git-friendly api client that stores requests in files.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: smaller feature set than postman.
Both tools compete in the API Development space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
ReadMe
Postman
Swagger
Redocly
Insomnia
RapidAPI