Netlify vs Fly.io
Netlify and Fly.io are both popular tools in the DevOps & Infrastructure space. Both use a freemium pricing model, with Netlify starting at Free and Fly.io at Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Netlify if you want deploy and scale modern web projects with instant rollbacks and edge functions.. Netlify's biggest strengths include excellent developer experience with simple setup and generous free tier for personal and small projects. It's also rated higher (4.4 vs 4.2). Choose Fly.io if you prefer deploy apps globally with vms close to your users in seconds.. Key advantages include global deployment as easy as single-region and full vm control without serverless limitations.
Deploy and scale modern web projects with instant rollbacks and edge functions.
Deploy apps globally with VMs close to your users in seconds.
| Netlify | Fly.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.2 |
| Categories | DevOps & Infrastructure | DevOps & Infrastructure |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Netlify | Fly.io |
|---|---|---|
| Git-based automatic deployments | ✓ | — |
| Serverless functions and edge functions | ✓ | — |
| Global CDN with instant cache invalidation | ✓ | — |
| Deploy previews for pull requests | ✓ | — |
| Built-in form handling and identity | ✓ | — |
| Split testing and gradual rollouts | ✓ | — |
| Global VM deployment in 30+ regions | — | ✓ |
| Firecracker microVM technology for fast boot | — | ✓ |
| Built-in Postgres and Redis hosting | — | ✓ |
| Anycast networking for global load balancing | — | ✓ |
| Persistent volumes for stateful apps | — | ✓ |
| Deploy from Dockerfile or buildpacks | — | ✓ |
Netlify
Pros
- + Excellent developer experience with simple setup
- + Generous free tier for personal and small projects
- + Built-in features reduce need for third-party services
- + Strong support for Jamstack and static sites
Cons
- − Build times can be slow for large projects
- − Serverless function limits more restrictive than AWS Lambda
- − Pricing can surprise with bandwidth overages
Fly.io
Pros
- + Global deployment as easy as single-region
- + Full VM control without serverless limitations
- + Free tier includes enough resources for small apps
- + Great for full-stack apps that need low latency globally
Cons
- − Steeper learning curve than Vercel or Netlify
- − Pricing can be complex with multiple resources
- − Less frontend-optimized than specialized platforms
The Bottom Line
Choose Netlify if: you want deploy and scale modern web projects with instant rollbacks and edge functions.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.4 vs 4.2). Keep in mind: build times can be slow for large projects.
Choose Fly.io if: you prefer deploy apps globally with vms close to your users in seconds.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: steeper learning curve than vercel or netlify.
Both tools compete in the DevOps & Infrastructure space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Amazon Q Developer
Snyk Code
Spacelift
Harness
GitLab Duo
PagerDuty