Raygun vs PostHog
Raygun and PostHog are both popular tools in the Debugging & Error Fixing space. Raygun uses a paid model starting at $14/mo, while PostHog is freemium from Free. PostHog offers a free tier, while Raygun does not. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: July 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Raygun if you want real-time error tracking and performance monitoring for web and mobile.. Raygun's biggest strengths include intelligent error grouping reduces noise significantly and deployment tracking helps identify release-caused issues. Choose PostHog if you prefer open-source product analytics with session replay and error tracking.. Key advantages include session replay makes debugging production issues dramatically easier and open-source with self-hosting option for complete data control. It also has a free tier to get started. It's also rated higher (3.8 vs 3.7).
Real-time error tracking and performance monitoring for web and mobile.
Open-source product analytics with session replay and error tracking.
| Raygun | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $14/mo | Free |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Freemium |
| Rating | ★ 3.7 | ★ 3.8 |
| Categories | Debugging & Error Fixing | Debugging & Error Fixing |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Raygun | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time error tracking and crash reporting | ✓ | — |
| AI-powered error grouping and prioritization | ✓ | — |
| Performance monitoring with real user data | ✓ | — |
| Deployment tracking to correlate releases with errors | ✓ | — |
| User tracking to see affected customers | ✓ | — |
| Support for web, mobile, and backend platforms | ✓ | — |
| Session replay to watch user interactions and debug issues | — | ✓ |
| Error tracking with stack traces and user context | — | ✓ |
| Feature flags for controlled rollouts and A/B testing | — | ✓ |
| Product analytics with funnels, trends, and user paths | — | ✓ |
| Heatmaps and clickmaps for UI/UX debugging | — | ✓ |
| Open-source and self-hostable for data privacy | — | ✓ |
Raygun
Pros
- + Intelligent error grouping reduces noise significantly
- + Deployment tracking helps identify release-caused issues
- + User impact scoring prioritizes the right issues
- + Clean, actionable dashboard interface
Cons
- − No free tier — paid subscription required
- − Smaller ecosystem than Sentry
- − Limited integrations compared to larger platforms
PostHog
Pros
- + Session replay makes debugging production issues dramatically easier
- + Open-source with self-hosting option for complete data control
- + Generous free tier with 1M events per month
- + All-in-one platform combining analytics, flags, and debugging tools
Cons
- − Can be overwhelming with the breadth of features for simple debugging needs
- − Self-hosted version requires infrastructure management
- − Session replay storage can get expensive at scale
The Bottom Line
Choose Raygun if: you want real-time error tracking and performance monitoring for web and mobile.. Keep in mind: no free tier — paid subscription required.
Choose PostHog if: you prefer open-source product analytics with session replay and error tracking.. It has a free tier to get started, which Raygun lacks. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (3.8 vs 3.7). Keep in mind: can be overwhelming with the breadth of features for simple debugging needs.
Both tools compete in the Debugging & Error Fixing space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Warp
Sentry
Jam.dev
Replay.io
Bugsnag
LogRocket