Semgrep vs Cursor
Semgrep and Cursor are two popular AI coding tools that developers frequently compare. Both use a freemium pricing model, with Semgrep starting at Free and Cursor at $20/mo. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Semgrep if you want fast, customizable static analysis for finding bugs and security issues. Semgrep's biggest strengths include extremely fast performance compared to traditional sast tools and easy-to-write custom rules without deep ast knowledge. Choose Cursor if you prefer the ai-first code editor built for speed and productivity.. Key advantages include best-in-class ai code editing with codebase context and familiar vs code interface with minimal learning curve. It's also rated higher (4.8 vs 4.3).
Fast, customizable static analysis for finding bugs and security issues
The AI-first code editor built for speed and productivity.
| Semgrep | Cursor | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | $20/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Rating | ★ 4.3 | ★ 4.8 |
| Categories | Code Review & Testing | Code Generation, AI Code Editors |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Semgrep | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern-based code scanning across 30+ programming languages | ✓ | — |
| Custom rule creation with intuitive YAML syntax | ✓ | — |
| Thousands of pre-built security and code quality rules | ✓ | — |
| CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions, GitLab, and more | ✓ | — |
| Fast local scanning with minimal false positives | ✓ | — |
| Differential scanning to analyze only changed code | ✓ | — |
| AI-powered code completion and generation | — | ✓ |
| Natural language code editing with Cmd+K | — | ✓ |
| Codebase-aware chat that indexes your entire project | — | ✓ |
| Multi-file editing with Composer | — | ✓ |
| Built on VS Code — supports all extensions | — | ✓ |
| Privacy mode with zero data retention | — | ✓ |
Semgrep
Pros
- + Extremely fast performance compared to traditional SAST tools
- + Easy-to-write custom rules without deep AST knowledge
- + Strong open-source community with extensive rule library
- + Privacy-first with local scanning and no code upload required
Cons
- − Advanced features like cross-file analysis require paid plans
- − Learning curve for writing complex multi-pattern rules
- − Language support maturity varies across different ecosystems
Cursor
Pros
- + Best-in-class AI code editing with codebase context
- + Familiar VS Code interface with minimal learning curve
- + Composer enables complex multi-file refactors
- + Supports multiple AI models including GPT-4 and Claude
Cons
- − Pro plan at $20/mo is pricier than GitHub Copilot
- − Heavy AI usage can hit rate limits on the free plan
- − Occasional lag with very large codebases
The Bottom Line
Choose Semgrep if: you want fast, customizable static analysis for finding bugs and security issues. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: advanced features like cross-file analysis require paid plans.
Choose Cursor if: you prefer the ai-first code editor built for speed and productivity.. It holds a higher user rating (4.8 vs 4.3). Keep in mind: pro plan at $20/mo is pricier than github copilot.
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
Bolt
Replit