Void vs TabNine
Void and TabNine are both popular tools in the Code Generation space. Void uses a open-source model starting at Free, while TabNine is freemium from $12/mo. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Void if you want the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. Void's biggest strengths include fully open-source with no vendor lock-in and complete data privacy with local model option. Choose TabNine if you prefer ai code completion that runs locally and respects your privacy.. Key advantages include best-in-class privacy with local model execution and wide ide and language support. It's also rated higher (4.1 vs 3.7).
The open-source Cursor alternative with full data privacy.
AI code completion that runs locally and respects your privacy.
| Void | TabNine | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | $12/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Freemium |
| Rating | ★ 3.7 | ★ 4.1 |
| Categories | Code Generation, AI Code Editors | Code Generation |
| Key Features | 6 features | 4 features |
| Feature | Void | TabNine |
|---|---|---|
| Open-source AI code editor based on VS Code | ✓ | — |
| Bring-your-own LLM provider support | ✓ | — |
| Local model support via Ollama | ✓ | — |
| AI chat with codebase context | ✓ | — |
| Inline code editing and generation | ✓ | — |
| Full VS Code extension compatibility | ✓ | — |
| AI code completions in 30+ programming languages | — | ✓ |
| Local model option for privacy-sensitive environments | — | ✓ |
| Integrates with VS Code, JetBrains, Vim, and more | — | ✓ |
| Team-trained models on your private codebase | — | ✓ |
Void
Pros
- + Fully open-source with no vendor lock-in
- + Complete data privacy with local model option
- + Familiar VS Code interface and extensions
- + Free to use with any LLM provider
Cons
- − Less polished AI experience than Cursor
- − Early-stage project with ongoing development
- − Local models require significant hardware
TabNine
Pros
- + Best-in-class privacy with local model execution
- + Wide IDE and language support
- + Enterprise-friendly with SOC 2 compliance
Cons
- − Code suggestions less capable than Copilot or Cursor
- − Local model requires decent hardware resources
- − No chat or agentic features compared to newer tools
The Bottom Line
Choose Void if: you want the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: less polished ai experience than cursor.
Choose TabNine if: you prefer ai code completion that runs locally and respects your privacy.. It holds a higher user rating (4.1 vs 3.7). Keep in mind: code suggestions less capable than copilot or cursor.
Both tools compete in the Code Generation space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
Bolt
Codeium