Continue.dev vs Zed
Continue.dev and Zed are both popular tools in the AI Code Editors space. Continue.dev uses a open-source model starting at Free, while Zed is free from Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: July 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Continue.dev if you want the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. Continue.dev's biggest strengths include complete flexibility in llm provider choice and fully open-source with active community. Choose Zed if you prefer a high-performance code editor with built-in ai and collaboration.. Key advantages include blazing fast — significantly faster than vs code and cursor and free and open-source with no usage limits. It's also rated higher (4.4 vs 3.5).
The open-source AI code assistant for any LLM and any IDE.
A high-performance code editor with built-in AI and collaboration.
| Continue.dev | Zed | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Free |
| Rating | ★ 3.5 | ★ 4.4 |
| Categories | Code Generation, AI Code Editors | AI Code Editors |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Continue.dev | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Tab autocomplete with any LLM provider | ✓ | — |
| In-editor chat with codebase context | ✓ | — |
| Support for local models via Ollama and LM Studio | ✓ | — |
| VS Code and JetBrains integration | ✓ | — |
| Customizable slash commands and context providers | ✓ | — |
| Fully open-source and self-hostable | ✓ | — |
| Built in Rust for maximum performance | — | ✓ |
| Built-in AI assistant with multiple LLM providers | — | ✓ |
| Real-time multiplayer collaboration | — | ✓ |
| Inline AI code generation and transformation | — | ✓ |
| Language server protocol support | — | ✓ |
| Vim mode and extensive keyboard shortcuts | — | ✓ |
Continue.dev
Pros
- + Complete flexibility in LLM provider choice
- + Fully open-source with active community
- + Works with local models for total privacy
- + Highly customizable through config files
Cons
- − Requires more setup than turnkey solutions like Copilot
- − Quality depends heavily on which LLM you connect
- − Less polished UX compared to commercial alternatives
Zed
Pros
- + Blazing fast — significantly faster than VS Code and Cursor
- + Free and open-source with no usage limits
- + Native multiplayer collaboration built in
- + Clean, distraction-free interface
Cons
- − Smaller extension ecosystem compared to VS Code
- − macOS and Linux only — no Windows support yet
- − AI features still maturing compared to Cursor
The Bottom Line
Choose Continue.dev if: you want the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: requires more setup than turnkey solutions like copilot.
Choose Zed if: you prefer a high-performance code editor with built-in ai and collaboration.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.4 vs 3.5). Keep in mind: smaller extension ecosystem compared to vs code.
Both tools compete in the AI Code Editors space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
Bolt