Figma Dev Mode vs Void
Figma Dev Mode and Void are both popular tools in the Code Generation space. Figma Dev Mode uses a paid model starting at $25/mo, while Void is open-source from Free. Void offers a free tier, while Figma Dev Mode does not. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Figma Dev Mode if you want bridge the gap between design and development with ai-powered code generation.. Figma Dev Mode's biggest strengths include eliminates manual design-to-code translation and ai code generation saves significant implementation time. It's also rated higher (4.0 vs 3.7). Choose Void if you prefer the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. Key advantages include fully open-source with no vendor lock-in and complete data privacy with local model option. It also has a free tier to get started.
Bridge the gap between design and development with AI-powered code generation.
The open-source Cursor alternative with full data privacy.
| Figma Dev Mode | Void | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $25/mo | Free |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Open-source |
| Rating | ★ 4.0 | ★ 3.7 |
| Categories | Code Generation, No-Code / Low-Code AI | Code Generation, AI Code Editors |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Figma Dev Mode | Void |
|---|---|---|
| AI-powered code generation from designs | ✓ | — |
| Ready-to-use CSS, React, and SwiftUI snippets | ✓ | — |
| Design token inspection and export | ✓ | — |
| Asset export in multiple formats | ✓ | — |
| Compare design versions for changes | ✓ | — |
| Plugin ecosystem for code framework support | ✓ | — |
| Open-source AI code editor based on VS Code | — | ✓ |
| Bring-your-own LLM provider support | — | ✓ |
| Local model support via Ollama | — | ✓ |
| AI chat with codebase context | — | ✓ |
| Inline code editing and generation | — | ✓ |
| Full VS Code extension compatibility | — | ✓ |
Figma Dev Mode
Pros
- + Eliminates manual design-to-code translation
- + AI code generation saves significant implementation time
- + Tight integration with Figma's design workflow
- + Supports multiple code frameworks
Cons
- − Requires Figma paid plan
- − Generated code may not match project conventions
- − Limited to component-level code generation
Void
Pros
- + Fully open-source with no vendor lock-in
- + Complete data privacy with local model option
- + Familiar VS Code interface and extensions
- + Free to use with any LLM provider
Cons
- − Less polished AI experience than Cursor
- − Early-stage project with ongoing development
- − Local models require significant hardware
The Bottom Line
Choose Figma Dev Mode if: you want bridge the gap between design and development with ai-powered code generation.. It holds a higher user rating (4.0 vs 3.7). Keep in mind: requires figma paid plan.
Choose Void if: you prefer the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. It has a free tier to get started, which Figma Dev Mode lacks. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: less polished ai experience than cursor.
Both tools compete in the Code Generation space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
Bolt