Glide vs Continue.dev
Glide and Continue.dev are two popular AI coding tools that developers frequently compare. Glide uses a freemium model starting at Free, while Continue.dev is open-source from Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Glide if you want build custom business apps from spreadsheets — no code required.. Glide's biggest strengths include extremely easy to get started with spreadsheet data and beautiful mobile-first app templates. It's also rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9). Choose Continue.dev if you prefer the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. Key advantages include complete flexibility in llm provider choice and fully open-source with active community.
Build custom business apps from spreadsheets — no code required.
The open-source AI code assistant for any LLM and any IDE.
| Glide | Continue.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Open-source |
| Rating | ★ 4.0 | ★ 3.9 |
| Categories | No-Code / Low-Code AI | Code Generation, AI Code Editors |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Glide | Continue.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Build apps from Google Sheets, Excel, and Airtable | ✓ | — |
| AI-powered app layout generation | ✓ | — |
| Mobile-first app design | ✓ | — |
| User authentication and role-based access | ✓ | — |
| Computed columns and business logic | ✓ | — |
| Custom actions and integrations | ✓ | — |
| Tab autocomplete with any LLM provider | — | ✓ |
| In-editor chat with codebase context | — | ✓ |
| Support for local models via Ollama and LM Studio | — | ✓ |
| VS Code and JetBrains integration | — | ✓ |
| Customizable slash commands and context providers | — | ✓ |
| Fully open-source and self-hostable | — | ✓ |
Glide
Pros
- + Extremely easy to get started with spreadsheet data
- + Beautiful mobile-first app templates
- + AI assists with initial app generation
- + Good for internal business workflows
Cons
- − Less powerful than code-based alternatives
- − Free tier limited in app users and rows
- − Not suitable for complex applications
Continue.dev
Pros
- + Complete flexibility in LLM provider choice
- + Fully open-source with active community
- + Works with local models for total privacy
- + Highly customizable through config files
Cons
- − Requires more setup than turnkey solutions like Copilot
- − Quality depends heavily on which LLM you connect
- − Less polished UX compared to commercial alternatives
The Bottom Line
Choose Glide if: you want build custom business apps from spreadsheets — no code required.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.0 vs 3.9). Keep in mind: less powerful than code-based alternatives.
Choose Continue.dev if: you prefer the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: requires more setup than turnkey solutions like copilot.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
Bolt