Hasura vs Thunder Client
Hasura and Thunder Client are both popular tools in the API Development space. Both use a freemium pricing model, with Hasura starting at Free and Thunder Client at Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Hasura if you want instant graphql and rest apis for your databases with built-in security.. Hasura's biggest strengths include dramatically reduces backend api development time and open-source with strong community support. It's also rated higher (4.4 vs 3.9). Choose Thunder Client if you prefer lightweight rest api client built directly into vs code.. Key advantages include no context switching — api testing in your editor and lightweight and fast compared to desktop apps.
Instant GraphQL and REST APIs for your databases with built-in security.
Lightweight REST API client built directly into VS Code.
| Hasura | Thunder Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 3.9 |
| Categories | API Development | API Development |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Hasura | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-generated GraphQL and REST APIs from databases | ✓ | — |
| Real-time subscriptions with live queries | ✓ | — |
| Role-based access control and row-level security | ✓ | — |
| Event triggers and scheduled triggers for workflows | ✓ | — |
| Remote schema stitching and federation | ✓ | — |
| Built-in caching and performance optimization | ✓ | — |
| REST API testing inside VS Code | — | ✓ |
| Environment variables and request collections | — | ✓ |
| Test scripting for automated validation | — | ✓ |
| Git-friendly JSON file storage | — | ✓ |
| GraphQL support | — | ✓ |
| Import from Postman, Insomnia, and OpenAPI | — | ✓ |
Hasura
Pros
- + Dramatically reduces backend API development time
- + Open-source with strong community support
- + Real-time capabilities out of the box
- + Works with existing databases without migration
Cons
- − GraphQL learning curve for teams new to the technology
- − Can be overkill for simple CRUD applications
- − Complex authorization rules require careful configuration
Thunder Client
Pros
- + No context switching — API testing in your editor
- + Lightweight and fast compared to desktop apps
- + Git-friendly file storage for team collaboration
- + Easy migration from Postman with import feature
Cons
- − Less feature-rich than Postman for complex workflows
- − Advanced features require paid plan
- − VS Code only — not available in other editors
The Bottom Line
Choose Hasura if: you want instant graphql and rest apis for your databases with built-in security.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.4 vs 3.9). Keep in mind: graphql learning curve for teams new to the technology.
Choose Thunder Client if: you prefer lightweight rest api client built directly into vs code.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: less feature-rich than postman for complex workflows.
Both tools compete in the API Development space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
ReadMe
Postman
Hoppscotch
Bruno
Swagger
Redocly