Void vs Continue.dev
Void and Continue.dev are both popular tools in the Code Generation and AI Code Editors space. Both use a open-source pricing model, with Void starting at Free and Continue.dev at Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Void if you want the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. Void's biggest strengths include fully open-source with no vendor lock-in and complete data privacy with local model option. Choose Continue.dev if you prefer the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. Key advantages include complete flexibility in llm provider choice and fully open-source with active community. It's also rated higher (3.9 vs 3.7).
The open-source Cursor alternative with full data privacy.
The open-source AI code assistant for any LLM and any IDE.
| Void | Continue.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Open-source |
| Rating | ★ 3.7 | ★ 3.9 |
| Categories | Code Generation, AI Code Editors | Code Generation, AI Code Editors |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Void | Continue.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Open-source AI code editor based on VS Code | ✓ | — |
| Bring-your-own LLM provider support | ✓ | — |
| Local model support via Ollama | ✓ | — |
| AI chat with codebase context | ✓ | — |
| Inline code editing and generation | ✓ | — |
| Full VS Code extension compatibility | ✓ | — |
| Tab autocomplete with any LLM provider | — | ✓ |
| In-editor chat with codebase context | — | ✓ |
| Support for local models via Ollama and LM Studio | — | ✓ |
| VS Code and JetBrains integration | — | ✓ |
| Customizable slash commands and context providers | — | ✓ |
| Fully open-source and self-hostable | — | ✓ |
Void
Pros
- + Fully open-source with no vendor lock-in
- + Complete data privacy with local model option
- + Familiar VS Code interface and extensions
- + Free to use with any LLM provider
Cons
- − Less polished AI experience than Cursor
- − Early-stage project with ongoing development
- − Local models require significant hardware
Continue.dev
Pros
- + Complete flexibility in LLM provider choice
- + Fully open-source with active community
- + Works with local models for total privacy
- + Highly customizable through config files
Cons
- − Requires more setup than turnkey solutions like Copilot
- − Quality depends heavily on which LLM you connect
- − Less polished UX compared to commercial alternatives
The Bottom Line
Choose Void if: you want the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: less polished ai experience than cursor.
Choose Continue.dev if: you prefer the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (3.9 vs 3.7). Keep in mind: requires more setup than turnkey solutions like copilot.
Both tools compete in the Code Generation, AI Code Editors space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
Bolt