Void vs JetBrains AI Assistant
Void and JetBrains AI Assistant are both popular tools in the Code Generation and AI Code Editors space. Void uses a open-source model starting at Free, while JetBrains AI Assistant is paid from $10/mo. Void offers a free tier, while JetBrains AI Assistant does not. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: July 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Void if you want the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. Void's biggest strengths include fully open-source with no vendor lock-in and complete data privacy with local model option. Plus, it has a free tier to get started. It's also rated higher (3.5 vs 3.0). Choose JetBrains AI Assistant if you prefer ai-powered coding help built into every jetbrains ide.. Key advantages include deep integration with jetbrains ide features and works across the entire jetbrains ecosystem.
The open-source Cursor alternative with full data privacy.
AI-powered coding help built into every JetBrains IDE.
| Void | JetBrains AI Assistant | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | $10/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Paid |
| Rating | ★ 3.5 | ★ 3.0 |
| Categories | Code Generation, AI Code Editors | Code Generation, AI Code Editors |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Void | JetBrains AI Assistant |
|---|---|---|
| Open-source AI code editor based on VS Code | ✓ | — |
| Bring-your-own LLM provider support | ✓ | — |
| Local model support via Ollama | ✓ | — |
| AI chat with codebase context | ✓ | — |
| Inline code editing and generation | ✓ | — |
| Full VS Code extension compatibility | ✓ | — |
| AI code completion and generation in all JetBrains IDEs | — | ✓ |
| Context-aware chat with codebase understanding | — | ✓ |
| Automatic commit message generation | — | ✓ |
| AI-powered documentation writing | — | ✓ |
| Code explanation and refactoring suggestions | — | ✓ |
| Integration with JetBrains inspections and refactoring | — | ✓ |
Void
Pros
- + Fully open-source with no vendor lock-in
- + Complete data privacy with local model option
- + Familiar VS Code interface and extensions
- + Free to use with any LLM provider
Cons
- − Less polished AI experience than Cursor
- − Early-stage project with ongoing development
- − Local models require significant hardware
JetBrains AI Assistant
Pros
- + Deep integration with JetBrains IDE features
- + Works across the entire JetBrains ecosystem
- + Leverages JetBrains' existing code intelligence
- + Excellent for Java, Kotlin, and Python developers
Cons
- − Requires JetBrains IDE subscription plus AI add-on
- − AI capabilities lag behind dedicated AI editors like Cursor
- − No free tier — only available with paid subscription
The Bottom Line
Choose Void if: you want the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. It has a free tier to get started, which JetBrains AI Assistant lacks. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (3.5 vs 3.0). Keep in mind: less polished ai experience than cursor.
Choose JetBrains AI Assistant if: you prefer ai-powered coding help built into every jetbrains ide.. Keep in mind: requires jetbrains ide subscription plus ai add-on.
Both tools compete in the Code Generation, AI Code Editors space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
