Void vs Tabby
Void and Tabby are both popular tools in the Code Generation space. Both use a open-source pricing model, with Void starting at Free and Tabby at Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Void if you want the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. Void's biggest strengths include fully open-source with no vendor lock-in and complete data privacy with local model option. Choose Tabby if you prefer self-hosted ai code completion assistant you can run on your own servers.. Key advantages include complete control over your code and data privacy and no subscription costs — fully open-source and free. It's also rated higher (4.2 vs 3.7).
The open-source Cursor alternative with full data privacy.
Self-hosted AI code completion assistant you can run on your own servers.
| Void | Tabby | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Open-source | Open-source |
| Rating | ★ 3.7 | ★ 4.2 |
| Categories | Code Generation, AI Code Editors | Code Generation |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Void | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Open-source AI code editor based on VS Code | ✓ | — |
| Bring-your-own LLM provider support | ✓ | — |
| Local model support via Ollama | ✓ | — |
| AI chat with codebase context | ✓ | — |
| Inline code editing and generation | ✓ | — |
| Full VS Code extension compatibility | ✓ | — |
| Self-hosted deployment on your own infrastructure | — | ✓ |
| AI-powered code completion across multiple languages | — | ✓ |
| Support for open-source models like StarCoder and CodeLlama | — | ✓ |
| IDE integrations for VS Code, IntelliJ, and Vim | — | ✓ |
| No data sent to external servers — complete privacy control | — | ✓ |
| Web UI for configuration and monitoring | — | ✓ |
Void
Pros
- + Fully open-source with no vendor lock-in
- + Complete data privacy with local model option
- + Familiar VS Code interface and extensions
- + Free to use with any LLM provider
Cons
- − Less polished AI experience than Cursor
- − Early-stage project with ongoing development
- − Local models require significant hardware
Tabby
Pros
- + Complete control over your code and data privacy
- + No subscription costs — fully open-source and free
- + Can run offline or on private networks
- + Customizable with different AI models and configurations
Cons
- − Requires technical setup and infrastructure to host
- − Code suggestions may be less accurate than commercial alternatives
- − Resource-intensive depending on model size and usage
The Bottom Line
Choose Void if: you want the open-source cursor alternative with full data privacy.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: less polished ai experience than cursor.
Choose Tabby if: you prefer self-hosted ai code completion assistant you can run on your own servers.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.2 vs 3.7). Keep in mind: requires technical setup and infrastructure to host.
Both tools compete in the Code Generation space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
