Zed vs Continue.dev
Zed and Continue.dev are both popular tools in the AI Code Editors space. Zed uses a free model starting at Free, while Continue.dev is open-source from Free. Both offer a free tier to get started. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: July 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Zed if you want a high-performance code editor with built-in ai and collaboration.. Zed's biggest strengths include blazing fast — significantly faster than vs code and cursor and free and open-source with no usage limits. It's also rated higher (4.4 vs 3.5). Choose Continue.dev if you prefer the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. Key advantages include complete flexibility in llm provider choice and fully open-source with active community.
A high-performance code editor with built-in AI and collaboration.
The open-source AI code assistant for any LLM and any IDE.
| Zed | Continue.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Free | Open-source |
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 3.5 |
| Categories | AI Code Editors | Code Generation, AI Code Editors |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Zed | Continue.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Built in Rust for maximum performance | ✓ | — |
| Built-in AI assistant with multiple LLM providers | ✓ | — |
| Real-time multiplayer collaboration | ✓ | — |
| Inline AI code generation and transformation | ✓ | — |
| Language server protocol support | ✓ | — |
| Vim mode and extensive keyboard shortcuts | ✓ | — |
| Tab autocomplete with any LLM provider | — | ✓ |
| In-editor chat with codebase context | — | ✓ |
| Support for local models via Ollama and LM Studio | — | ✓ |
| VS Code and JetBrains integration | — | ✓ |
| Customizable slash commands and context providers | — | ✓ |
| Fully open-source and self-hostable | — | ✓ |
Zed
Pros
- + Blazing fast — significantly faster than VS Code and Cursor
- + Free and open-source with no usage limits
- + Native multiplayer collaboration built in
- + Clean, distraction-free interface
Cons
- − Smaller extension ecosystem compared to VS Code
- − macOS and Linux only — no Windows support yet
- − AI features still maturing compared to Cursor
Continue.dev
Pros
- + Complete flexibility in LLM provider choice
- + Fully open-source with active community
- + Works with local models for total privacy
- + Highly customizable through config files
Cons
- − Requires more setup than turnkey solutions like Copilot
- − Quality depends heavily on which LLM you connect
- − Less polished UX compared to commercial alternatives
The Bottom Line
Choose Zed if: you want a high-performance code editor with built-in ai and collaboration.. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.4 vs 3.5). Keep in mind: smaller extension ecosystem compared to vs code.
Choose Continue.dev if: you prefer the open-source ai code assistant for any llm and any ide.. It's completely free to use. Keep in mind: requires more setup than turnkey solutions like copilot.
Both tools compete in the AI Code Editors space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
Cursor
GitHub Copilot
Windsurf
Claude Code
TabNine
Bolt