Mabl vs Percy
Mabl and Percy are both popular tools in the Code Review & Testing space. Mabl uses a paid model starting at $40/mo, while Percy is freemium from Free. Percy offers a free tier, while Mabl does not. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Mabl if you want ai-native test automation platform for modern software teams.. Mabl's biggest strengths include auto-healing tests reduce maintenance burden significantly and unified testing across multiple testing types. Choose Percy if you prefer automated visual testing to catch ui regressions in every pr.. Key advantages include catches visual regressions that unit tests miss and excellent cross-browser testing coverage. It also has a free tier to get started. It's also rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1).
AI-native test automation platform for modern software teams.
Automated visual testing to catch UI regressions in every PR.
| Mabl | Percy | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $40/mo | Free |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Freemium |
| Rating | ★ 4.1 | ★ 4.2 |
| Categories | Code Review & Testing | Code Review & Testing |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Mabl | Percy |
|---|---|---|
| AI-powered auto-healing test maintenance | ✓ | — |
| Low-code test creation with visual editor | ✓ | — |
| Unified UI, API, and accessibility testing | ✓ | — |
| Performance testing and monitoring | ✓ | — |
| CI/CD pipeline integration | ✓ | — |
| Cross-browser and cross-device testing | ✓ | — |
| Automated visual regression testing | — | ✓ |
| Cross-browser screenshot comparison | — | ✓ |
| Responsive design testing across screen sizes | — | ✓ |
| GitHub and GitLab PR integration | — | ✓ |
| Approval workflows for visual changes | — | ✓ |
| Integration with Cypress, Playwright, and Storybook | — | ✓ |
Mabl
Pros
- + Auto-healing tests reduce maintenance burden significantly
- + Unified testing across multiple testing types
- + Low-code approach accessible to non-developers
- + Strong CI/CD integration for continuous testing
Cons
- − No free tier — paid subscription required
- − Can be expensive for larger teams
- − Complex test scenarios may require workarounds
Percy
Pros
- + Catches visual regressions that unit tests miss
- + Excellent cross-browser testing coverage
- + Good integration with popular testing frameworks
- + Approval workflow makes review process clear
Cons
- − Free tier limited to a small number of screenshots
- − Can produce false positives from dynamic content
- − Pricing scales with screenshot volume
The Bottom Line
Choose Mabl if: you want ai-native test automation platform for modern software teams.. Keep in mind: no free tier — paid subscription required.
Choose Percy if: you prefer automated visual testing to catch ui regressions in every pr.. It has a free tier to get started, which Mabl lacks. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.2 vs 4.1). Keep in mind: free tier limited to a small number of screenshots.
Both tools compete in the Code Review & Testing space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
