Percy vs Mabl
Percy and Mabl are both popular tools in the Code Review & Testing space. Percy uses a freemium model starting at Free, while Mabl is paid from $40/mo. Percy offers a free tier, while Mabl does not. Below we break down features, pricing, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which tool fits your workflow best.
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Choose Percy if you want automated visual testing to catch ui regressions in every pr.. Percy's biggest strengths include catches visual regressions that unit tests miss and excellent cross-browser testing coverage. Plus, it has a free tier to get started. It's also rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1). Choose Mabl if you prefer ai-native test automation platform for modern software teams.. Key advantages include auto-healing tests reduce maintenance burden significantly and unified testing across multiple testing types.
Automated visual testing to catch UI regressions in every PR.
AI-native test automation platform for modern software teams.
| Percy | Mabl | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | $40/mo |
| Free Tier | Yes | No |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Paid |
| Rating | ★ 4.2 | ★ 4.1 |
| Categories | Code Review & Testing | Code Review & Testing |
| Key Features | 6 features | 6 features |
| Feature | Percy | Mabl |
|---|---|---|
| Automated visual regression testing | ✓ | — |
| Cross-browser screenshot comparison | ✓ | — |
| Responsive design testing across screen sizes | ✓ | — |
| GitHub and GitLab PR integration | ✓ | — |
| Approval workflows for visual changes | ✓ | — |
| Integration with Cypress, Playwright, and Storybook | ✓ | — |
| AI-powered auto-healing test maintenance | — | ✓ |
| Low-code test creation with visual editor | — | ✓ |
| Unified UI, API, and accessibility testing | — | ✓ |
| Performance testing and monitoring | — | ✓ |
| CI/CD pipeline integration | — | ✓ |
| Cross-browser and cross-device testing | — | ✓ |
Percy
Pros
- + Catches visual regressions that unit tests miss
- + Excellent cross-browser testing coverage
- + Good integration with popular testing frameworks
- + Approval workflow makes review process clear
Cons
- − Free tier limited to a small number of screenshots
- − Can produce false positives from dynamic content
- − Pricing scales with screenshot volume
Mabl
Pros
- + Auto-healing tests reduce maintenance burden significantly
- + Unified testing across multiple testing types
- + Low-code approach accessible to non-developers
- + Strong CI/CD integration for continuous testing
Cons
- − No free tier — paid subscription required
- − Can be expensive for larger teams
- − Complex test scenarios may require workarounds
The Bottom Line
Choose Percy if: you want automated visual testing to catch ui regressions in every pr.. It has a free tier to get started, which Mabl lacks. It's completely free to use. It holds a higher user rating (4.2 vs 4.1). Keep in mind: free tier limited to a small number of screenshots.
Choose Mabl if: you prefer ai-native test automation platform for modern software teams.. Keep in mind: no free tier — paid subscription required.
Both tools compete in the Code Review & Testing space. The right choice depends on your specific needs, team size, and budget.
